01
Specialized AI or ML work is outside the current team
The partner can own the client relationship and product direction. seKer AI can take the model, RAG, or integration work that would otherwise stall the project.
Extend your technical capacity with specialized AI, machine learning, and software development support. We help software houses and digital agencies deliver complex work without expanding their in-house specialist teams.
White-label or behind-the-scenes delivery is available when it fits the engagement. Direct projects are welcome too.
seKer delivery pipeline
Partner collaboration · illustrative
Brief
Partner scope
Build
seKer engineering
Deliver
Partner ships
Pipeline focus
Activity
You keep the client relationship. seKer AI takes the agreed technical slice and hands it back for delivery.
These are the practical problems software houses and agencies run into when a brief needs AI or extra engineering depth.
01
The partner can own the client relationship and product direction. seKer AI can take the model, RAG, or integration work that would otherwise stall the project.
02
When a pipeline is already full, adding a specialist hire is slow. Project-based engineering support covers a defined scope without a permanent role.
03
Many briefs are not greenfield. We work inside the current architecture, APIs, and release process so the partner can keep shipping the rest of the product.
04
Some projects only need help on one slice: retrieval quality, evaluation, a FastAPI service, or a forecasting model. That can be scoped on its own.
05
White-label or behind-the-scenes delivery is an option we can discuss. The partner stays the face of the work; we agree communication and responsibilities up front.
The partner stays close to the client. seKer AI takes the agreed technical slice.
A partner sends the project scope, technical constraint, or client brief. We review what is already decided, what is missing, and whether the work is a fit.
seKer AI provides the relevant engineering work — models, RAG, APIs, or product features — against a defined deliverable, stack, and communication rhythm.
The partner presents and ships the work to its client. Responsibilities, review points, and how we appear (or do not appear) are agreed before build starts.
A shorter list, on purpose. These are the areas we can support with substance — not a catalog of every possible AI service.
Add language-model features to an existing product: copilots, document tools, content workflows, and API-backed assistants.
Useful when A partner has a client who wants AI inside a current product, but the in-house team should not pause other delivery to learn the stack.
Retrieval systems that answer from a defined knowledge base, with source tracking and a path to iterate on quality.
Useful when Consultants, support teams, or internal staff spend too long searching documents that already exist.
Forecasting, scoring, and classification models connected to the data and workflows a team already uses.
Useful when A project needs predictions or ranking, not only a chatbot, and the current team lacks ML delivery capacity.
Tool-using agents and automations that complete multi-step work, with human review on the steps that need it.
Useful when Repetitive operations, research, or hand-offs are eating delivery time that should stay with the partner’s client work.
Application, API, and integration work so AI features sit cleanly inside the product instead of as a disconnected demo.
Useful when The AI piece is only useful if it talks to the existing CRM, database, auth, or client portal — and that engineering still has to ship.
These are capability illustrations — typical problems and the systems we build around them — not a gallery of named client projects.
RAGProblem
A delivery or consulting team already has the answers in documents, but people still lose time hunting for them.
What we build
A retrieval assistant that searches a defined corpus, returns answers with sources, and can sit behind the partner’s own interface.
Discuss a similar project
AgentsProblem
Routine questions and hand-offs consume the same people who should be doing higher-value client work.
What we build
A tool-using agent that drafts or completes routine steps, with a path to a human when the case is unclear or high-risk.
Discuss a similar project
Machine learningProblem
Planning still depends on spreadsheets and lagging reports, while the useful signals already sit in the data.
What we build
Predictive models and a review surface the partner can connect to existing ops or product workflows.
Discuss a similar projectA short recorded walkthrough will live here once it is ready. Until then, the illustrations above show the kinds of systems we typically build.
Differentiators we can stand behind without inflating the story.
Partners can add LLM, RAG, ML, and backend work without standing up a permanent specialist team first.
Engagements are scoped around a deliverable. We can support a full build or a defined part of a larger project.
Most useful AI work has to live inside current codebases, data stores, and release habits. That integration work is part of the job.
We agree what seKer AI builds, what the partner owns, and how reviews happen — before the work starts.
The aim is a usable system the partner can hand over or keep extending, not a slide-deck prototype that cannot leave a notebook.
If a policy is still agreed per project, we say so.
Published writing on Medium — useful context, not a substitute for a project conversation.
Share a short brief. We’ll tell you whether the work is a fit and how a collaboration could be scoped.